Clinical and Computational Evaluation of an Anatomic Patellar Component.

INTRODUCTION: Anatomic patellar components for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have demonstrated favorable in vivo kinematics. A novel failure mechanism in patients implanted with anatomic patella components was observed, prompting a clinical and computational investigation to identify patient and implant-related factors associated with suboptimal performance. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed comparing 100 TKA patients implanted with anatomical versus 100 sex-, age-, and BMI-matched patients implanted with dome patellar components. All were implanted with the same posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA system with a minimum 1-year follow-up duration. Several radiographic parameters were assessed. A separate computational evaluation was performed using finite-element analysis, comparing components. Bone strain energy density was measured at the proximal and distal patellar poles. RESULTS: Patients who had anatomic patellar components had a significantly higher prevalence of anterior knee pain (AKP; 18 versus 2%, P < 0.001), chronic effusions (18 versus 2%, P < 0.001), and superior patellar pole fragmentation (36 versus 13%, P < 0.001) versus those who had dome patellar components. The anatomic group also demonstrated more lateral patellar subluxation (2.3 versus 1.1 mm, P < 0.001) and lateral tilt (5.4 versus 4.0 mm, P = 0.013). There was a higher, but not significant, number of revisions in the anatomic group (7 versus 3, P = 0.331). In computational evaluation, all simulations demonstrated increased bone strain energy density at the superior patellar pole for the anatomic patella. Resection thickness < 13 mm resulted in an over 2-fold increase in strain energy density, while a negative 7° resection angle resulted in a 6-fold higher superior pole strain energy. CONCLUSION: Patients who had this design of anatomic patellar component showed higher rates of AKP, effusion, and superior pole fragmentation than patients who had dome patellae, with higher superior patella pole strain energy confirmed on computational evaluation. Avoiding higher resection angles and excessive patellar resection may improve the performance and survivorship of the anatomic patella.

Commercial Synovial Antigen Testing is Inferior to Traditional Culture for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite its limitations, a culture remains the "gold standard" for pathogen identification in patients who have periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, a synovial fluid antigen test has been introduced by a commercial entity. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the accuracy of the antigen test in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: This retrospective study identified 613 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty who had undergone preoperative synovial fluid analysis. A PJI was defined using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Patients who had an extended period (> 180 days) from aspiration to revision procedure (n = 62), those presenting within 90 days of their index arthroplasty procedure (n = 17), and patients who had an inconclusive ICM score (n = 8) were excluded. Using receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, we examined the utility of the microbial identification (MID) antigen test and any positive culture (either preoperative or intraoperative) in the diagnosis of PJI. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients were included. Of these, 125 (23.8%) were ICM positive and 401 (76.2%) were ICM negative. Culture demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864, sensitivity of 75.2%, and specificity of 97.5%. On the other hand, the MID test exhibited an AUC of 0.802, sensitivity of 61.6%, and specificity of 98.8%. The AUC of culture was significantly higher than that of the MID test (P = .037). The MID test was positive in 41.9% of culture-negative PJI cases. We also observed a high rate of discordance (29.7%) when both culture and the MID test were positive in the ICM-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial fluid antigen testing does not provide additional clinical benefit when compared to traditional cultures for the diagnosis of PJI. The antigen test had low sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI and a relatively high rate of discordance with culture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Manipulation Under Anesthesia to Treat Postoperative Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) occurs in 4% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anti-inflammatory medications may target arthrofibrosis pathogenesis, but the data are limited. This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the effect of adjuvant anti-inflammatory medications with MUA and physical therapy on range of motion (ROM) and outcomes. METHODS: There were 124 patients (124 TKAs) who developed stiffness after primary TKA for osteoarthritis enrolled across 15 institutions. All received MUA when ROM was < 90° at 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Randomization proceeded via a permuted block design. Controls received MUA and physical therapy, while the treatment group also received one dose of pre-MUA intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) and 14 days of oral celecoxib (200 mg). The ROM and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks and 1 year. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. RESULTS: The ROM significantly improved a mean of 46° from a pre-MUA ROM of 72 to 118° immediately after MUA (P < .001). The ROM was similar between the treatment and control groups at 6 weeks following MUA (101 versus 99°, respectively; P = .35) and at one year following MUA (108 versus 108°, respectively; P = .98). Clinical outcomes were similar at both end points. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, the addition of intravenous dexamethasone and a short course of oral celecoxib after MUA did not improve ROM or outcomes. However, MUA provided a mean ROM improvement of 46° immediately, 28° at 6 weeks, and 37° at 1 year. Further investigation in regards to dosing, duration, and route of administration of anti-inflammatory medications remains warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, RCT.

Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on the Mode of Failure.

Background: Complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that necessitate revision cause considerable psychological distress and symptoms of depression, which are linked to poorer postoperative outcomes, increased complications, and increased healthcare utilization. We aimed to identify the prevalence of mental health disorders and symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA and to stratify these patients based on their mechanism of failure. Methods: All patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA from 2008 to 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Patients (n = 394) were grouped based on 7 failure modes previously described. Patients were considered to have depressive symptoms if their Veterans RAND-12 mental component score was below 42. Preoperative and postoperative Veterans RAND-12 mental component scores at the latest follow-up were evaluated. Results: Overall comparative prevalence of preoperative to postoperative depressive symptoms was 23.4%-18.8%. By mode of failure are as follows: arthrofibrosis (25.8%-16.7%), aseptic loosening (25.3%-18.9%), extensor mechanism disruption (25%-50%), failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (8.6%-14.3%), instability (25.7%-17.1%), osteolysis or polyethylene wear (23.1%-23.1%), and patellar failure (11.8%-23.5%). There was no difference in depressive symptoms among failure modes preoperatively (P = .376) or at the latest postoperative follow-up (P = .175). Conclusions: The prevalence of depressive symptoms in revision TKA patients appears to be independent of failure mode. Surgeon awareness and screening for depressive symptoms in this patient population preoperatively with referral for potential treatment may improve early postoperative outcomes.

Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Spinopelvic Relationship: What's the Latest!

Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has proved to be a successful surgical procedure, both prosthetic and bone impingement resulting in dislocation continue to occur. Studies have shown that spine pathology resulting in lumbar stiffness and hip arthritis often coexist. Spinopelvic mobility patterns during postural changes affect three-dimensional acetabular component position, which affects the incidence of prosthetic impingement and THA instability. Several spinopelvic risk factors that may affect THA stability have been identified. Numerous reports recommend performing a preoperative spinopelvic mobility analysis to identify risk factors and adjust acetabular component position accordingly to lessen the risk of impingement. In doing so, acetabular component position is individualized based on spinopelvic mobility patterns. Additionally, functional femoral anteversion, affected by individual femoral rotation patterns during dynamic activities, may contribute to the incidence of impingement. It is important to review the interrelationship between spine and pelvic mobility and how it relates to THA and may reduce the incidence of instability.

Perioperative Sleep Quality Disturbances in Total Joint Arthroplasty is Multifactorial.

BACKGROUND: Sleep quality following arthroplasty procedures is important for patient recovery and satisfaction, but remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to report risk factors for sleep disturbances in the perioperative period in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty procedures. METHODS: Sleep surveys were prospectively collected on 751 consecutive patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at our institution between June 2019 and February 2021 at their preoperative and postoperative visits (2 and 6 weeks). Data were collected on patient demographics, opioid use (preoperatively and postoperatively) as well as tobacco and alcohol use, and specific medical diagnosis that may influence sleep patterns (ie, depression). Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t-tests and 1-way analysis of variances. RESULTS: For both total hip and total knee patients, worse sleep patterns preoperatively were found in patients who used opioids prior to surgery (P < .001), were current smokers (P < .001), and were aged less than 65 years (P < .001). Postoperative persistent opioid use (more than 3 months) was seen in patients who had worse reported sleep quality preoperatively (P < .001). In comparison to total hip arthroplasty, patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty were more likely to report less sleep in the postoperative period. Patients who were current smokers (compared to nonsmokers or previous smokers) (P = .014) had worse sleep quality at all time points that persisted at 6 weeks, although these differences were seen more in total hip patients than in total knee patients (P = .006 versus P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality disturbances around the time of surgery appear to be multifactorial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) as a treatment option for isolated patellofemoral disease continues to evolve. Enhancement in patient selection, surgical technique, implant design, and technology has led to improved short-term and midterm outcomes. Furthermore, in the setting of a younger patient with isolated patellofemoral arthritis, PFA represents an option for improved function with faster recovery times, bone preservation, maintenance of ligamentous proprioception, and the ability to delay total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The most common reason for revising PFA to a TKA is progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. In general, conversion of PFA to TKA leads to successful outcomes with minimal bone loss and the ability to use primary TKA implants and instrumentation. PFA seems to be a cost-effective alternative to TKA in appropriately selected patients with 5-, 10-PFA survivorships of 91.7% and 83.3%, respectively, and an annual revision rate of 2.18%; however, more long-term clinical studies are needed to determine how new designs and technologies affect patient outcomes and implant performance.

The Microbiome of Osteoarthritic Hip and Knee Joints: A Prospective Multicenter Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies have made it possible to characterize the microbial profile in anatomical sites previously assumed to be sterile. We used this approach to explore the microbial composition within joints of osteoarthritic patients. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study recruited 113 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty between 2017 and 2019. Demographics and prior intra-articular injections were noted. Matched synovial fluid, tissue, and swab specimens were obtained and shipped to a centralized laboratory for testing. Following DNA extraction, microbial 16S-rRNA sequencing was performed. RESULTS: Comparisons of paired specimens indicated that each was a comparable measure for microbiological sampling of the joint. Swab specimens were modestly different in bacterial composition from synovial fluid and tissue. The 5 most abundant genera were Escherichia, Cutibacterium, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas. Although sample size varied, the hospital of origin explained a significant portion (18.5%) of the variance in the microbial composition of the joint, and corticosteroid injection within 6 months before arthroplasty was associated with elevated abundance of several lineages. CONCLUSIONS: The findings revealed that prior intra-articular injection and the operative hospital environment may influence the microbial composition of the joint. Furthermore, the most common species observed in this study were not among the most common in previous skin microbiome studies, suggesting that the microbial profiles detected are not likely explained solely by skin contamination. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between the hospital and a "closed" microbiome environment. These findings contribute to establishing the baseline microbial signal and identifying contributing variables in the osteoarthritic joint, which will be valuable as a comparator in the contexts of infection and long-term arthroplasty success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does Individualization of Cup Position Affect Prosthetic or Bone Impingement Following Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Spinopelvic (SP) mobility patterns during postural changes affect three-dimensional acetabular component position, the incidence of prosthetic impingement, and total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. Surgeons have commonly placed the acetabular component in a similar "safe zone" for most patients. Our purpose was to determine the incidence of bone and prosthetic impingement with various cup orientations and determine if a preoperative SP analysis with individualized cup orientation lessens impingement. METHODS: A preoperative SP evaluation of 78 THA subjects was performed. Data were analyzed using a software program to determine the prevalence of prosthetic and bone impingement with a patient individualized cup orientation versus 6 commonly selected cup orientations. Impingement was correlated with known SP risk factors for dislocation. RESULTS: Prosthetic impingement was least with the individualized choice of cup position (9%) versus preselected cup positions (18%-61%). The presence of bone impingement (33%) was similar in all groups and not affected by cup position. Factors associated with impingement in flexion were age, lumbar flexion, pelvic tilt (stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion. Risk factors in extension included standing pelvic tilt, standing SP tilt, lumbar flexion, pelvic rotation (supine to stand and stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion. CONCLUSION: Prosthetic impingement is reduced with individualized cup positioning based on SP mobility patterns. Bone impingement occurred in one-third of patients and is a noteworthy consideration in preoperative THA planning. Known SP risk factors for THA instability correlated with the presence of prosthetic impingement in both flexion and extension.

Component Rotation in Well-Functioning, Gap Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Navigation.

BACKGROUND: Malalignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is a potential cause of clinical failure following TKA. Since the goal of a gap balancing (GB) technique is equal flexion and extension gaps secondary to soft-tissue balancing, and not necessarily component alignment, variation in component placement may exist. Our purpose was (1) to evaluate precision of component alignment in well-functioning GB TKAs performed without the aid of navigation using computed tomographic evaluation and (2) to determine any relationship between femoral version and/or tibial torsion and TKA component positioning. METHODS: There were 93 well-functioning TKAs performed with an extension gap first GB technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up evaluated using computed tomography to assess component rotational alignment, as well as osseous femoral version and tibial torsion. Femoral and tibial rotational alignment was assessed by previously described methods. RESULTS: The mean Knee Society Score was 185.7 ± 21.7. The mean range of motion was 128.5 ± 7.8°. Femoral posterocondylar axis (relative to the transepicondylar axis) values ranged from -8.3 to 4.1° with a mean of -0.78 ± 2.7° (internal rotation). Mean tibial rotation was 17.2 ± 7.9° internal rotation relative to the tibial tubercle. No correlation was found between native femoral version and femoral component rotational alignment (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r, 0.007). Weak correlation was found between native tibial torsion and tibial component alignment (r = 0.24). CONCLUSION: Despite being only a secondary objective with the GB technique, most components evaluated were within the desired range of rotation. Alignment was not influenced by native osseous rotational geometry. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

High Incidence of Recurrent Patellofemoral Crepitus in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Following Arthroscopic Debridement.

Background: Patellofemoral crepitus is an unfavorable complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a posterior-stabilized (PS) implant. The purpose of this study was to study patellar crepitus recurrence and reoperation rates following arthroscopic debridement in patients with a PS-TKA. Methods: Our institution database was used to identify patients with a PS-TKA who underwent arthroscopic debridement for patellofemoral crepitus at our institution. Patients must have had a resurfaced patella and minimum 2 years clinical follow-up from the arthroscopic debridement to be included in the study. Recurrence of patellar crepitus, subsequent operations, and any adverse events were documented. Results: We identified 35 patients who met inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 8.0 years (range 2.1 to 18.4 years) from their arthroscopic debridement. Nineteen patients (54.3%) had history of a nonarthroplasty knee surgery prior to their TKA. The mean time interval between TKA and arthroscopic debridement for patellar crepitus was 1.6 years (range 0.2 to 5.0 years). Overall, 16 patients (45.7%) developed recurrent crepitus (8 asymptomatic and 8 symptomatic). Six of the symptomatic patients (17.1% of the entire cohort) underwent a repeat surgery for recurrent patellofemoral crepitus. Of theses 6 patients, 3 developed recurrent crepitus but only 1 patient had a third surgical procedure. No postoperative complications were noted following any surgical procedure. The mean knee range of motion following arthroscopic debridement did not change (126.9° preoperatively vs 127.0° postoperatively). Conclusions: Patients experienced high rates of recurrent patellofemoral crepitus following arthroscopic debridement. One-sixth of the patient cohort required a second surgical intervention for recurrent crepitus.

Cannabis Use Does Not Affect Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use in patients undergoing arthroplasty has increased with ongoing legalization throughout the United States. The purpose of this study was to report total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes in patients self-reporting cannabis use. METHODS: There were 74 patients who underwent primary THA from January 2014 to December 2019 at a single institution with minimum 1-year follow-up who had their self-reported cannabis use retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had a history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse were excluded. A match control was conducted based on age; body mass index; sex; Charlson Comorbidity Index; insurance status; and use of nicotine, narcotics, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines to patients undergoing THA who did not self-report cannabis use. Outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Reconstruction (HOOS JR), in hospital morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumed, outpatient MMEs prescribed, in hospital lengths of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: There was no difference in the preoperative, postoperative, or change in Harris Hip Score or HOOS JR between cohorts. There was also no difference in hospital MMEs consumed (102.4 versus 101, P = .92), outpatient MMEs prescribed (119 versus 156, P = .11) or lengths of stay (1.4 versus 1.5 days, P = .32). Also, readmissions (4 versus 4, P = 1.0) and reoperations (2 versus 1, P = .56) were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: Self-reported cannabis use does not influence 1-year outcomes after THA. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of perioperative cannabis use after THA to help guide orthopaedic surgeons in counseling patients.

Classifying Bone Loss in Failed Stemmed Total Knee Arthroplasty: Determining Reliability.

BACKGROUND: Failed stemmed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components present with varying degrees of bone loss and technical challenges. A classification system has been proposed based upon metaphyseal bone loss and diaphyseal cortical integrity. A validation study was performed to determine interobserver and intraobserver reliability at multiple institutions and with different levels of training. METHODS: An online survey with digital anteroposterior and lateral radiographs was sent to 5 arthroplasty surgeons and 5 adult reconstruction fellows. The survey included 62 cases with stemmed femoral and tibial components, considered failures and pending revision, and scored by each reviewer independently using the classification system. Each case was scored in 2 separate sessions. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interobserver grading for both the femur (0.69) and tibia (0.72) showed strong reliability among the attendings and fellows, with slightly stronger reliability in tibia cases. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for attendings and fellows was similar overall, demonstrating consistency of the grading regardless of training level. Intraobserver comparisons showed a strong ICC for attendings and fellows in femoral cases, while fellows had near-perfect ICC in tibia cases. Across all reviewers there was on average 93% agreement within 1 grade per case with the majority of the discrepancy occurring at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. CONCLUSION: This classification demonstrated overall strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, with 93% agreement within 1 grade of bone loss. With further education, this classification system can ultimately be used to standardize the degree of bone loss in failed stemmed components and help with preoperative planning.

Screening and Management of Malnutrition in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Malnutrition is an increasingly prevalent problem in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Increased risks associated with TJA in the setting of malnourishment have been well documented. Standardized scoring systems in addition to laboratory parameters such as albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, and total lymphocyte count have been developed to identify and evaluate malnourished patients. Despite an abundance of recent literature, there is no consensus on the best approach for screening TJA patients from a nutritional standpoint. Although there are a variety of treatment options, including nutritional supplements, nonsurgical weight loss therapies, bariatric surgery, and the involvement of dieticians and nutritionists, the effect of these interventions on TJA outcomes has not been well characterized. This overview of the most current literature aims to provide a clinical framework for approaching nutrition status in arthroplasty patients. A comprehensive understanding of the tools available for managing malnourishment will facilitate improved arthroplasty care.

High Prevalence of Spinopelvic Risk Factors in Patients With Post-Operative Hip Dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Excessive standing posterior pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar spine stiffness, low pelvic incidence (PI), and severe sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) have been linked to increased dislocation rates. We aimed to determine the prevalence of these 4 parameters in a cohort of unstable total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients and compare these to a large representative control population of primary THA patients. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with instability following primary THA were compared to a control cohort of 9414 THA patients. Lateral X-rays in standing and flexed-seated positions were used to assess PT and lumbar lordosis (LL). Computed tomography scans were used to measure PI and acetabular cup orientation. Thresholds for "at risk" spinopelvic parameters were standing posterior PT ≤ -15°, lumbar flexion (LLstand-LLseated) ≤ 20°, PI ≤ 41°, PI ≥ 70°, and SSD (PI-LLstand mismatch ≥ 20°). RESULTS: There were significant differences in mean spinopelvic parameters between the dislocating and control cohorts (P < .001). There were no differences in mean PI (58° versus 56°, respectively, P = .29) or prevalence of high and low PI between groups. 67% of the dislocating patients had one or more significant risk factors, compared to only 11% of the control. A total of 71% of the dislocating patients had cup orientations within the traditional safe zone. CONCLUSION: Excessive standing posterior PT, low lumbar flexion, and a severe SSD are more prevalent in unstable THAs. Pre-op screening for these parameters combined with appropriate planning and implant selection may help identify at risk patients and reduce the prevalence of dislocation.

Self-Reported Cannabis Use Is Associated With a Lower Rate of Persistent Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: Legalization of cannabis, along with concern over prescription opiate use, has garnered interest in cannabis for adjuvant pain control. This study examines the relationship between cannabis and opioid consumption after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Methods: Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA with minimum 6-month follow-up who self-reported cannabis use were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 210 patients (128 TKAs and 82 THAs) were matched by age; gender; type of arthroplasty; Charlson Comorbidity Index; and use of nicotine, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines to patients who did not self-report cannabis use. Patients receiving an opioid prescription after 90 days postoperatively were classified as persistent opioid users (POUs). Duration of opioid use (DOU) was calculated for non-POU patients as the time between surgery and their last opioid prescription. Differences in inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), outpatient MMEs, POU, and DOU were analyzed. Results: Cannabis users required equivalent inpatient and outpatient MMEs. There was no difference in DOU. There was a significant difference in POU between cannabis users and matched controls (1.4% [n = 3] vs 9.5% [n = 20], P < .001, respectively). Grouping patients by TKA or THA, there remained a difference in POU for TKA (1.5% [n = 2] vs 10.9% [n = 14], P = .002) and THA (1.2% [n = 1] vs 7.3% [n = 6], P = .04). There was no difference in inpatient or outpatient MMEs or DOU for THA and TKA patients. Conclusions: There is a reduced rate of POU in patients who self-report perioperative cannabis use. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of cannabis as an adjunct to perioperative pain control.

Effectiveness of Manual Terminal Cleaning Varies on High-Touch Surfaces Near the Operative Field.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection may result from pathogen to patient transmission within the environment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the contamination level of selected high-touch surfaces in the operating room (OR) using a blacklight fluorescent marking system after a manual terminal clean. Methods: Prior to the manual terminal clean, 16 high-touch surfaces were marked using a blacklight fluorescent gel. The marked areas were assessed the next morning for thoroughness of cleaning. Surfaces were categorized based on the average percent of the marks removed as "clean" (>75%), "partially clean" (26%-74%), or poorly cleaned (<25%). This process was repeated randomly 12 times. Terminal cleaning was done in the standard fashion, and the perioperative team was unaware of the initiation of this study. Results: A total of 936 marks were analyzed. There was a significant difference in the number of marks completely clean (29.1%, 272/936) vs marks that were not touched (40.8%, 382/936), P < .001. Only the OR back table (75%) had a rating of clean. Partially clean areas included Mayfield table (72%), overhead lights (70.1%), infusion pump (61.1%), clock reset button (58.3%), table remote control (50%), tourniquet machine (50%), and the OR table (33.3%). Poorly cleaned surfaces included anesthesia medication cart (21.8%), door handles (20.8%), phone (16.7%), electrocautery unit (16.7%), foot pedal (16.7%), anesthesia cart (16.2%), nurses' station (14.1%), and supply cabinet doors (6%). Conclusions: Effectiveness of manual terminal cleaning varied greatly across surfaces. In general, surfaces further from the operative field were less likely to have markings removed.

Alpha-Defensin Offers Limited Utility in Work-Up Prior to Reimplantation in Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-defensin (AD) is a synovial biomarker included in the 2018 consensus criteria for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Its value in assessing eradication of infection prior to second stage reimplantation is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of AD on eligibility for reimplantation following resection for chronic PJI. METHODS: This study included patients who previously underwent resection arthroplasty for PJI. Synovial fluid aspirated from 87 patients was retrospectively reviewed. All patients completed a 6-week course of intravenous antibiotics and an appropriate drug holiday. Synovial white blood cell count, percentage neutrophils, and culture from the AD immunoassay laboratory were reviewed with serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein values from our institution. A modified version of the 2018 consensus criteria was used, including white blood cell count, percentage neutrophils, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. AD was then added to determine if it changed diagnosis or clinical management. RESULTS: Four patients were categorized as "infected" (score >6), none exhibited a positive AD or positive culture. Sixty eight patients were diagnosed as "possibly infected" (score 2 to 5), none had a positive AD, and one had a positive culture (Cutibacterium acnes). AD did not change the diagnosis from "possibly infected" to "infected" in any case or alter treatment plans. Fifteen patients had a score of <2 (not infected) and none had a positive AD. CONCLUSION: The routine use of AD in the work-up prior to a second-stage arthroplasty procedure for PJI may not be warranted.

An Enhanced Understanding of Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Next-Generation Sequencing: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The challenges of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have led to the emergence of molecular methods of pathogen identification, including next-generation sequencing (NGS). While its increased sensitivity compared with traditional culture techniques is well documented, it is not fully known which organisms could be expected to be detected with use of NGS. The aim of this study was to describe the NGS profile of culture-negative PJI. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty from June 2016 to August 2020 at 14 institutions were prospectively recruited. Patients meeting International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI were included in this study. Intraoperative samples were obtained and concurrently sent for both routine culture and NGS. Patients for whom NGS was positive and standard culture was negative were included in our analysis. RESULTS: The overall cohort included 301 patients who met the ICM criteria for PJI. Of these patients, 85 (28.2%) were culture-negative. A pathogen could be identified by NGS in 56 (65.9%) of these culture-negative patients. Seventeen species were identified as common based on a study-wide incidence threshold of 5%. NGS revealed a polymicrobial infection in 91.1% of culture-negative PJI cases, with the set of common species contributing to 82.4% of polymicrobial profiles. Escherichia coli, Cutibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus aureus ranked highest in terms of incidence and study-wide mean relative abundance and were most frequently the dominant organism when occurring in polymicrobial infections. CONCLUSIONS: NGS provides a more comprehensive picture of the microbial profile of infection that is often missed by traditional culture. Examining the profile of PJI in a multicenter cohort using NGS, this study demonstrated that approximately two-thirds of culture-negative PJIs had identifiable opportunistically pathogenic organisms, and furthermore, the majority of infections were polymicrobial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Use of Cannabis Does Not Decrease Opioid Consumption in Patients Who Underwent Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: The primary purpose of this study was to determine if cannabis use decreases narcotic consumption in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Material and methods: Forty-six patients undergoing a primary unilateral TJA, who self-reported the use of cannabis, were prospectively enrolled and completed this study between July 2015 and November 2019. This cohort was prospectively matched to patients who did not report cannabis use. Morphine equivalents (MEs) were averaged and recorded at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes and complications were recorded and reported. Results: There were no differences noted in ME during the hospitalization between the user (78.7 ± 58.5) and nonusers (70.4 ± 46.3), P = .455. ME daily average did not differ between the cohorts (user [36.8 ± 30.7] and nonuser [31.7 ± 25.6] at 1 week (P = .389) or user [22.5 ± 26.3] and nonusers [15.9 ± 18.3] at 2 weeks, P = .164, postoperatively). The total ME at 2 weeks did not differ between the user and nonuser groups (415 ± 375 vs 333 ± 275, P = .235). Pain scores at 1 week were significantly higher in patients who used cannabis (4.1 ± 1.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.6, P = .05). No differences in pain were noted during the patient's hospitalization or at 2- (P = .071) or 6-week (P = .111) follow-up. No differences in secondary outcomes or complications were noted. Conclusion: We were unable to show a decrease in narcotic consumption in patients who use cannabis undergoing primary unilateral joint replacement. These findings do not support the routine use of cannabis to decrease or supplement narcotic use after primary TJA. Level of evidence: Level II therapeutic.